Dr. David Dolphin’s Vampire Theory
Ever wonder how vampire legends were born, or why vampire hysteria in the Middle Ages reached the level it did? Well you aren’t alone; those questions also crossed the mind of Dr. David Dolphin, who was a chemistry professor at the University of British Columbia.
In 1985 Dr. Dolphin presented a theory that the victims of the disease porphyria during the Middle Ages may have been responsible for the spread of the vampire legend and hysteria. At the time, thousands upon thousands of people lived in fear of vampires, and just as many innocents were executed for being vampires. Countless corpses were dug up and staked, chopped up, burned and more. Dolphin argued that those that suffered porphyria may have caused this.
The symptoms of porphyria may make a person appear undead. They have serious photosensitivity, aversion to garlic, hairiness, and elongated teeth - just like the vampires in the myths we all know so well now. These people that had the disease supposedly took to drinking blood in the desperate effort to alleviate their pain. You see, blood introduced the required element into their body, heme.
The press covered Dr. Dolphin’s theory, but most headlines mocked or criticized him. The hypothesis also caused quite the stir in the medical field as well, they would either point out all the flaws in the theory or they took to complaining about the negative publicity generated. Others simply didn’t like the mixing of science with traditions and legends.
Considering that people back in the Middle Ages didn’t often use science as an explanation for events, but rather religion and superstition, this theory could very well hold true. But porphyria isn’t the only culprit here, there are others as well, like rabies.
What do you think, do you agree with Dr. David Dolphin’s porphyria theory? Or do you think that the vampire legends really did come from real vampires?
- Moonlight
No related posts.
Related Reading:
The Lure of the Vampire: Gender, Fiction and Fandom from Bram Stoker to Buffy the Vampire SlayerThe Lure of the Vampire: Gender, Fiction and Fandom from Bram Stoker to Buffy the Vampire Slayer explores the curiosity and fascination surroundin... Read More >
Theorizing Twilight: Critical Essays on What's at Stake in a Post-Vampire WorldSince the publication of Twilight in 2005, Stephenie Meyer's four-book saga about the tortured relationship between human heroine Bella Swan and her v... Read More >
The Secret History of Vampires: Their Multiple Forms and Hidden PurposesAnciently, not all vampires were blood suckers. They included shroud-eaters, nightmares, stirges, and ghouls. Claude Lecouteux looks back to a time when vampires were understood differently from the child of the night depicted in modern movies and books.
Vampires: The Occult Truth (Llewellyn Truth About Series)Feeling drained? Perhaps you are the unwitting victim of a psychic vampire. Want to know more? In this his second book, Konstantinos explores the fo... Read More >
I agree with sceptics.
1. People suffering from porphyria don´t drink blood.
2. In folklore (and classic literature like Dracula and Carmilla) vampires walked happily in sunlight – they were NOT photosensitive. It was 1922 Nosferatu which added vampires-burn-in-the-sun-nonsense.
3. Vampires of Middle and Eastern European folklore were red and often fat (not rotten or disfigured monsters, BTW, like sometimes is claimed – they looked like ordinary humans). According to Paul Barber, red skin of the vampire bodies, exposed under dead skin, was dermis, they were swollen by gas and blood dripping from their mouths was also caused by decomposing process.
That’s only some myths. Keep in mind that every country had their own, the red skin and sunlight was only in a few countries, not all. :)
Is there any photosensitive vampires in folklore, like Dolphin claims? And porphyria victims do not drink blood! I´m sorry if I sounded snappy, and I am not folklorist or anything, but Dolphin clearly does not know what he is speaking! p
Some scholars believe that at the time some porphyria victims tried to drink blood in a way to alleviate the pain and to balance out their body since blood has heme in it. Medicine was incredibly barbaric back then and doctors experimented with all sorts of methods for healing someone – from bloodletting, to disgusting concoctions, and possibly blood drinking.
As for vampires in folklore that couldn’t go into the sun – there is the soucouyant, who would actually be destroyed by the sunlight. And while few folktales tell of vampires being destroyed by the sun, there are many versions of one story and in some vampires can’t go into the sunlight. Like the Greek vrykolakas, every part of Greece had their own stories about this vampire, and while most said it could go out into the sun, other believed that it couldn’t. The stories vary from area to area.
But MOST vampires in European folklore fit into category I mentioned earlier. There is blood-sucking monsters around the world, but was Dolphin speaking about them? No. He is clearly speaking of pale-faced, sun-fearing vampires of modern lore. We must to agree to disagree. I think his theory is rightly dismissed as rubbish – for the reasons above – while you think it is worth to ponder. Shrug.
food for thought… or blood.